Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Cognition. 2012 Jun;123(3):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 9.

What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices.

Author information

  • 1Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1TP, UK. Oriel.FeldmanHall@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Moral ideals are strongly ingrained within society and individuals alike, but actual moral choices are profoundly influenced by tangible rewards and consequences. Across two studies we show that real moral decisions can dramatically contradict moral choices made in hypothetical scenarios (Study 1). However, by systematically enhancing the contextual information available to subjects when addressing a hypothetical moral problem-thereby reducing the opportunity for mental simulation-we were able to incrementally bring subjects' responses in line with their moral behaviour in real situations (Study 2). These results imply that previous work relying mainly on decontextualized hypothetical scenarios may not accurately reflect moral decisions in everyday life. The findings also shed light on contextual factors that can alter how moral decisions are made, such as the salience of a personal gain.

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PMID:
22405924
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3355304
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk