Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Feb;50(1):7-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. slilien@emory.edu

Abstract

Like many domains of professional psychology, school psychology continues to struggle with the problem of distinguishing scientific from pseudoscientific and otherwise questionable clinical practices. We review evidence for the scientist-practitioner gap in school psychology and provide a user-friendly primer on science and scientific thinking for school psychologists. Specifically, we (a) outline basic principles of scientific thinking, (b) delineate widespread cognitive errors that can contribute to belief in pseudoscientific practices within school psychology and allied professions, (c) provide a list of 10 key warning signs of pseudoscience, illustrated by contemporary examples from school psychology and allied disciplines, and (d) offer 10 user-friendly prescriptions designed to encourage scientific thinking among school psychology practitioners and researchers. We argue that scientific thinking, although fallible, is ultimately school psychologists' best safeguard against a host of errors in thinking.

Copyright © 2011 Society for the Study of School Psychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk