Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Feb;7(1):58-70. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.58.

Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Author information

  • 1Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. freemanb@wustl.edu

Abstract

Clinical studies conducted in intensive care units are associated with logistical and ethical challenges. Diseases investigated are precipitous and life-threatening, care is highly technological, and patients are often incapacitated and decision-making is provided by surrogates. These investigations increasingly involve collection of genetic data. The manner in which the exigencies of critical illness impact attitudes regarding genetic data collection is unstudied. Given interest in understanding stakeholder preferences as a foundation for the ethical conduct of research, filling this knowledge gap is timely. The conduct of opinion research in the critical care arena is novel. This brief report describes the development of parallel patient/surrogate decision-maker quantitative survey instruments for use in this environment. Future research employing this instrument or a variant of it with diverse populations promises to inform research practices in critical illness gene variation research.

PMID:
22378135
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3297487
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk