Serotonin activates both pharyngeal pumping and isthmus peristalsis. SER-7 in MC and M4 (and possibly M2) separately activates pumping and isthmus peristalsis, respectively, in response to bacteria. Despite the separate regulation, isthmus peristalsis is coupled to the preceding pump.
A, A temporal representation of the onsets of pharyngeal pumping and isthmus peristalsis. Each black bar indicates onset of a pharyngeal pump. Each gray bar indicates the onset of an isthmus peristalsis.
B,
C, IP was selectively coupled to the preceding (
B) but not to the following (
C) PP in wild-type worms. Each filled circle indicates the interval between isthmus peristalsis and the indicated pump in one worm. ***
p < 0.001; Pearson’s correlation test; n.s. indicates not significant (
p ≥ 0.05); data are shown as mean ± SD.
D,
E, Serotonin activated both pumping and isthmus peristalsis.
D, A scatterplot of feeding rates of wild type (wt) with or without serotonin treatment. Each dot represents one worm. Thus, the
x and
y values of each dot indicate pumping rate and isthmus peristalsis rate, respectively, of one worm.
E, For simplicity, we transformed scatterplots into ellipse plots. The central dot is plotted at the mean pumping and isthmus peristalsis rate for each tested strain or condition. The large ellipse, a plot of root-mean-square deviation from the mean, shows the extent of variation from animal to animal. The width of the ellipse is

times the SD of pumping rate, the height is

times the SD of isthmus peristalsis rate, and narrowness or breadth is related to correlation. For normally distributed data, 63% of data points would be within the ellipse. The small ellipse similarly shows the likely range of the mean.
F, Both feeding rates of the
tph-1(mg280) null mutant decreased to75%of wild-type animals in response to bacteria, a physiologically relevant stimulant of feeding.
G, The
ser-7(tm1325) null mutant was defective in activating pharyngeal pumping in response to serotonin.
H, The
ser-7 null mutation decreased isthmus peristalsis rate in the
gsa-1(ce81) gain-of-function mutant in response to serotonin.
I–M, SER-7 in MC cell-autonomously activates pharyngeal pumping in response to serotonin.
I,
J, Expression of
ser-7 cDNA using the
flp-21 promoter (
I) or the
flp-2 promoter (
J) fully restored pumping in the
ser-7 null mutant in response to serotonin.
pflp-2::ser-7(+) only partly restored isthmus peristalsis rate (
J). This might be because the
flp-2 promoter drives weak occasional expression in M4 (Kim and Li, 2004).
K, Expression of
ser-7 cDNA in M4 using the
ser-7b promoter increased isthmus peristalsis but not pumping in the
ser-7 null mutant in response to serotonin.
L, The
eat-2(ad465) null mutation, which specifically blocks cholinergic transmission from MC to pharyngeal muscles, suppressed the rescue effect of
pflp-21::ser-7(+) in the
ser-7 mutant in response to serotonin.
M, SER-7 acts mainly in M4 to stimulate isthmus peristalsis in response to serotonin.
N, Both feeding rates of the
ser-7 null mutant decreased to 75% of wild-type animals in response to bacteria, a physiologically relevant stimulant of feeding.
O, As seen in response to serotonin, expression of
ser-7 cDNA from the
flp-21 promoter fully restored pumping in the
ser-7 null mutant in response to bacteria.
P, Expression of
ser-7 cDNA in M4 fully restored isthmus peristalsis rate in the
ser-7 null mutant with a small effect on pharyngeal pumping in response to bacteria. ***
p < 0.001; **
p < 0.01; n.s., not significant (
p > 0.05); unpaired
t test (two-tailed test) was used for comparison of pumping rates, and the level of significance is indicated by green asterisks; isthmus peristalsis rates were compared as described in Materials and Methods, and the level of significance is indicated by asterisks in pink.
#Comparison of isthmus peristalsis rates was infeasible due to lack of overlap in pumping rates between the two compared samples. The number of animals tested (
n ≥ 3 independent experiments per each group) is shown in parentheses. For the comparisons with the transgenics expressing rescue constructs, transgenic animals expressing only co-injection marker(s) were used as controls.