Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Jan;40(1):137-41.

End-of-life practices in a tertiary intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia.

Author information

  • 1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Erratum in

  • Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Mar;40(2):351. Al-Qahtani, M [corrected to Al-Qahtani, S]; Jahdali, Hamdan A [corrected to Al-Jahdali, H].


Our aim was to evaluate end-of-life practices in a tertiary intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia. A prospective observational study was conducted in the medical-surgical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Over the course of the one-year study period, 176 patients died and 77% of these deaths were preceded by end-of-life decisions. Of these, 66% made do-not-resuscitate decisions, 30% decided to withhold life support and 4% withdrew life support. These decisions were made after a median time of four days (Q1 to Q3: 1 to 9) and at least one day before death (Q1 to Q3: 1 to 4). The patients' families or surrogates were informed for 88% of the decisions and all decisions were documented in the patients' medical records. Despite religious and cultural values, more than three-quarters of the patients whose deaths were preceded by end-of-life decisions gave do-not-resuscitate decisions before death. These decisions should be made early in the patients' stay in the intensive care unit.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Australian Society of Anaesthetists
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk