Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Feb;166(2):134-40. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.657.

    Associations between sexuality education in schools and adolescent birthrates: a state-level longitudinal model.

    Source

    Department of Psychiatry, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. rehgp@psychiatry.wustl.edu

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    To examine the impact of sexuality education practices on adolescent birthrates while controlling for demographic characteristics and religious/political factors at a state level.

    DESIGN:

    Prospective cohort study.

    SETTING:

    Twenty-four states, from 1997 through 2005.

    PARTICIPANTS:

    Girls aged 15 to 17 years.

    MAIN EXPOSURE:

    The state sexuality education practices (ie, sexually transmitted disease prevention, pregnancy prevention, condom efficacy) for 1996 through 2004 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention School Health Profiles Survey.

    MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

    State birthrates for girls aged 15 to 17 years for 1997 through 2005 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    RESULTS:

    In a longitudinal, unadjusted model, our findings provide evidence that increased sexuality education within school curricula is associated with lower adolescent birthrates (average sexuality education topics β = -0.61; P = .001). However, the effect of sexuality education disappeared when taking into consideration the demographic characteristics, religiosity, and abortion policies of the state (average sexuality education topics β = -0.12; P = .26). States with higher religiosity rankings and greater political conservatism had higher adolescent birthrates.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The effects of sexuality education were constrained by state characteristics and do not independently explain the considerable variations in adolescent birthrates found across states. Our findings underscore the strong influence of state characteristics on adolescent birthrates above and beyond sexuality education, which must be considered when evaluating the efficacy of sexuality education programs.

    PMID:
    22312172
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC3433801
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

    Figure

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk