Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Apr;218(2):169-79. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3004-0.

Motor imagery of tool use: relationship to actual use and adherence to Fitts’ law across tasks.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-5288, USA. macuga@uoregon.edu

Abstract

A Fitts’ task was used to investigate how tools are incorporated into the internal representations that underlie pointing movements, and whether such knowledge can be generalized across tasks. We measured the speed-accuracy trade-offs that occurred as target width was varied for both real and imagined movements. The dynamics of the pointing tool used in the task were manipulated--regular pen, top-heavy tool, and bottom-heavy tool--to test the fidelity of internal representations of movements involving the use of novel tools. To test if such representations can be generalized, the orientation of the pointing task was also manipulated (horizontal vs. vertical). In all conditions, both real and imagined performances conformed to the speed-accuracy relationship described by Fitts’ law. We found significant differences in imagined MTs for the two weighted tools compared to the regular pen, but not between the weighted tools. By contrast, real movement durations differed between all tools. These results indicate that even relatively brief experience using novel tools is sufficient to influence the internal representation of the dynamics of the tool-limb system. However, in the absence of feedback, these representations do not make explicit differences in performances resulting from the unique dynamics of these weighted tools.

PMID:
22294026
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3351569
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk