Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 2):470-2. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182383959.

    Successful pregnancies after removal of intratubal microinserts.

    Source

    Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, USA. DrMonteith@tubal-reversal.net

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Patients with intratubal microinsert sterilization later may request reversal.

    CASE:

    Each patient underwent mini-laparotomy and removal of intratubal microinserts. One patient underwent unilateral tubotubal anastomosis and unilateral tubouterine implantation through a cornual uterine incision. The other patient underwent bilateral tubouterine implantation through a posterior transfundal uterine incision. The first patient became pregnant 4 months after surgery, had an uncomplicated pregnancy, and underwent an elective cesarean delivery at term. The second patient became pregnant 8 months after surgery and had a pregnancy complicated by unexplained abdominal pain at 34 weeks of gestation that resulted in early cesarean delivery.

    CONCLUSION:

    Proximal tubal occlusion from intratubal microinserts can be corrected surgically and can provide patients an alternative to in vitro fertilization.

    PMID:
    22270442
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk