Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Nucl Med. 2012 Feb;53(2):215-24. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.096677. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

Tumor dosimetry and response for 153Sm-ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonic acid therapy of high-risk osteosarcoma.

Author information

  • 1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Abstract

(153)Sm-ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonic acid ((153)Sm-EDTMP) therapy for osteosarcoma is being investigated. In this study, we analyzed the influence of (153)Sm-EDTMP administered activity (AA), osteosarcoma tumor density, mass, and the shape of the tumor on absorbed dose (AD). We also studied the biologic implication of the nonuniform tumor AD distribution using radiobiologic modeling and examined the relationship between tumor AD and response.

METHODS:

Nineteen tumors in 6 patients with recurrent, refractory osteosarcoma enrolled in a phase I or II clinical trial of (153)Sm-EDTMP were analyzed using the 3-dimensional radiobiologic dosimetry (3D-RD) software package. Patients received a low dose of (153)Sm-EDTMP (37.0-51.8 MBq/kg), followed on hematologic recovery by a second, high dose (222 MBq/kg). Treatment response was evaluated using either CT or MRI after each therapy. SPECT/CT of the tumor regions were obtained at 4 and 48 h or 72 h after (153)Sm-EDTMP therapy for 3D-RD analysis. Mean tumor AD was also calculated using the OLINDA/EXM unit-density sphere model and was compared with the 3D-RD estimates.

RESULTS:

On average, a 5-fold increase in the AA led to a 4-fold increase in the mean tumor AD over the high- versus low-dose-treated patients. The range of mean tumor AD and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) for low-dose therapy were 1.48-14.6 and 0.98-3.90 Gy, respectively. Corresponding values for high-dose therapy were 2.93-59.3 and 1.89-12.3 Gy, respectively. Mean tumor AD estimates obtained from OLINDA/EXM were within 5% of the mean AD values obtained using 3D-RD. On an individual tumor basis, both mean AD and EUD were positively related to percentage tumor volume reduction (P = 0.031 and 0.023, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

The variations in tumor density, mass, and shape seen in these tumors did not affect the mean tumor AD estimation significantly. The tumor EUD was approximately 2- and 3-fold lower than the mean AD for low- and high-dose therapy, respectively. A dose-response relationship was observed for transient tumor volume shrinkage.

PMID:
22251554
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3291096
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (6)Free text

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk