Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a novel therapy for patients with refractory heart failure (HF). Large clinical trials evaluating CRT have demonstrated significant improvements in cardiac survival, decreases in recurrent HF hospitalization, and improvements in indexes of quality of life. Although numerous mechanisms are involved in CRT's therapeutic effects, correction of both interventricular and intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony has been postulated as the key mechanism. To date, most large randomized controlled trials evaluating CRT have identified dyssynchronous patients on the basis of prolongation of the QRS complex from the baseline electrocardiogram. Concerns have been raised regarding the use of this measure for patient selection, stemming from a significant 30% to 40% nonresponse rate to CRT. Because of the cost and invasive nature of CRT, optimal patient selection for this therapy has become a priority for HF specialists and electrophysiologists. Cardiac imaging modalities have attempted to fulfill this need to improve patient selection by identifying mechanical dyssynchrony. Although early echocardiographic studies reported promising results, more recent larger scale studies have curtailed this enthusiasm, with a lack of established selection criteria for CRT in the current practice guidelines. This review summarizes the evidence to date and the potential role of imaging modalities in the selection and care of patients with HF referred for CRT.

Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.