Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Dec 15. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00415.x. [Epub ahead of print]

    Evaluation of Primary Stability of Self-Tapping and Non-Self-Tapping Dental Implants. A 12-Week Clinical Study.

    Source

    Professor, Clinic of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Stomatology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia senior lecturer of General and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain associate professor, Clinic of Maxillofacial, Oral surgery and Implantology, Military Academy, Belgrade, Serbia senior lecturer of pharmacological interactions, Dental School, University of Granada, Granada, Spain lecturer, Clinic of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Stomatology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia collaborate lecturer of Pharmacological Interactions, Dental School, University of Granada, Granada, Spain lecturer of Restorative Dentistry Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain PhD student, Clinic of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Stomatology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

    Abstract

    Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between surgical techniques and implant macro-design (self-tapping/non-self-tapping) for the optimization of implant stability in the low-density bone present in the posterior maxilla using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Materials and Methods: A total of 102 implants were studied. Fifty-six self-tapping BlueSkyBredent® (Bredent GmbH&Co.Kg®, Senden, Germany) and 56 non-self-tapping Standard Plus Straumann® (Institut Straumann AG®, Waldenburg, Switzerland) were placed in the posterior segment of the maxilla. Implants of both types were placed in sites prepared with either lateral bone-condensing or with bone-drilling techniques. Implant stability measurements were performed using RFA immediately after implant placement and weekly during a 12-week follow-up period. Results: Both types of implants placed after bone condensing achieved significantly higher stability immediately after surgery, as well as during the entire 12-week observation period compared with those placed following bone drilling. After bone condensation, there were no significant differences in primary stability or in implant stability after the first week between both implant types. From 2 to 12 postoperative weeks, significantly higher stability was shown by self-tapping implants. After bone drilling, self-tapping implants achieved significantly higher stability than non-self-tapping implants during the entire follow-up period. Conclusions: The outcomes of the present study indicate that bone drilling is not an effective technique for improving implant stability and, following this technique, the use of self-tapping implants is highly recommended. Implant stability optimization in the soft bone can be achieved by lateral bone-condensing technique, regardless of implant macro-design.

    © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    PMID:
    22171668
    [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk