Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Surg Innov. 2012 Sep;19(3):268-74. doi: 10.1177/1553350611429028. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

A comparison of extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches for robotic prostatectomy.

Author information

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA. brucejac@med.umich.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study compared oncologic and health-related quality-of-life outcomes among patients undergoing intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal robotic prostatectomy.

METHODS:

Of 215 patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy, the approach was intraperitoneal in 48 and extraperitoneal in 167. Cancer control was evaluated using margin status. Recovery after surgery and functional health was assessed using the convalescence and recovery evaluation and expanded prostate cancer index composite questionnaires, respectively.

RESULTS:

Positive surgical margin rates were similar between approaches (14% extraperitoneal, 10% intraperitoneal; P = .63). Functional outcomes were slightly improved for those with the extraperitoneal approach (i.e., higher urinary irritation/obstruction scores at 3 months). The extraperitoneal group demonstrated higher activity (91.8 vs 83.3, P = .03) and cognitive scores (94.9 vs. 91.7, P = .04) at 6 weeks as well as higher gastrointestinal scores at 2 weeks (94.2 vs. 90.8, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

These data support efforts to broaden the adoption of the extraperitoneal approach for robotic prostatectomy.

PMID:
22170893
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3391538
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk