Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Jan;26(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04011.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Comparison of pegylated interferon α-2b plus psoralen PUVA versus standard interferon α-2a plus PUVA in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Author information

  • 1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.



The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of pegylated interferon α-2b (PEG-IFN α-2b) in combination with photochemotherapy (PUVA) in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in comparison with standard IFN α plus PUVA.


Retrospective cohort study over a period of 7 years.


A total of 17 consecutive CTCL patients (stage IA-IV) were retrospectively analysed for toxicity and response rates associated with PEG-IFN α-2b (1.5 μg/kg weekly) plus PUVA (n = 9) or standard IFN α-2a (9 MIU 3×/week) plus PUVA (n = 8).


Differences of response rates (complete/partial remission), progression-free survival, discontinuation of therapy, safety and toxicity profiles according to World Health Organization - Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (WHO-CTCAE).


Myelosuppression and liver toxicity occured more frequently during PEG-IFN α-2b plus PUVA treatment than during standard IFN α-2a plus PUVA therapy [77.8 vs. 50% (odds ratio 1.477) and 77.8 vs. 50% (odds ratio 1.692), respectively]. By contrast, the occurence of constitutional side-effects (mainly fatigue) [100 vs.77.8% (odds ratio 0.889)] and more adverse events leading to study discontinuation was considerably higher in the standard IFN α-2a plus PUVA group. The overall response rate in the PEG-IFN α-2b plus PUVA group (89%) was significantly superior.


In patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma PEG-IFN α-2b plus PUVA might become a promising treatment alternative as its higher rate of myelosuppression and liver toxicity is outweighed by its lower percentage of constitutional side-effects, and its significantly higher overall response. Due to the small number of participants at this retrospective study, a larger prospective study is essential to verify our results.

© 2011 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology © 2011 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk