Abstract

Careful studies in an adequate sample of subjects show a very marked degree of variability in the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol--specifically, in parameters such as area under the curve, half-life, and time to peak. This variability is seen in differences between different populations, as well as from one individual to another. These studies also show variability in area under the curve and other parameters in the same person from time to time. Such differences may equal or exceed the differences between low dose (35 micrograms) and high-dose (50 micrograms) formulations. The levels of plasma ethinyl estradiol produced by a 50 micrograms dose of mestranol are similar to those from 35 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol. Thus a high-dose pill may be no higher than a low-dose pill if the nature of the estrogen is not kept in mind. Qualitative differences in the oxidative metabolites of estrogens may be of significance with respect to oncogenic potential.

PIP:

The variability in the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) is pronounced, especially regarding such parameters as area under the curve, half-life, and time to peak. This variability shows up in different populations, different individuals, or in the same individual, and can even exceed the differences between low dose (35 mcg) and high- dose (50 mcg) formulations. 50 mcg of mestranol and 35 mcg of ethinyl estradiol both produce similar plasma EE levels. Qualitative differences in the oxidative metabolites of estrogens may be of significance with respect to oncogenic potential. The pharmacokinetic differences of EE whether caused by dietary, ethnic, or other factors are not merely differences in gastric absorption or renal excretion. Studies on kinetics and bioavailability showed that after oral administration of EE 3-sulfate only about 20% appeared as free EE in the blood, while EE 17-sulfate produced about half this amount. Individual variation showed a large spread both for plasma total EE sulfate levels and free EE. The pharmacokinetics of three 1 mg norethindrone/35 mcg EE and three 1 mg norethindrone/50 mcg mestranol formulations were analyzed and the mean values, standard deviations, and highest and lowest individual plasma patterns of the 3 EE preparations were indistinguishable. The administration of 50 mcg of mestranol resulted in an average area under the curve EE of 963 +- 544, whereas the dose 35 mcg of EE produced an area under the curve of 1036 +- 483, thus 35 mcg of EE proved to be a stronger dose than 50 mcg of mestranol. Inter- and intraindividual variability was demonstrated in a study: 24 patients received 35 mcg EE formulations and 27 others received 50 mcg mestranol agents. 3 identical formulations by different manufacturers proved to be bioequivalent. Extreme values ranged from -79% to +134% of the mean of the 3 determinations per individual. Clinical implications of these findings are that plasma EE levels engendered by 35 mcg EE may be indistinguishable from those produced by 50 mcg in another person. 2 to 3 mcg of moxestrol (the 11 beta-methoxy derivative of EE) is an effective contraceptive, as it is 10 times as potent as EE. Exposure of certain cell clones to estradiol, EE, and stilbestrol causes formation in vitro to foci of transformed (neoplastic) cells. However, moxestrol did not produce such cell transformation and these oxidative metabolites increased with estradiol or EE but not with moxestrol. This does not prove the oncogenic role of estrogens in humans, but it offers a new approach in the development of safer estrogens.