Feasibility and outcome of vaginal paravaginal repair using the Capio suture-capturing device

Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Mar;23(3):341-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1566-1. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This investigation describes the feasibility and outcome of vaginal paravaginal repair (VPVR) performed using the Capio suture-capturing device.

Methods: This prospective study included 36 women with paravaginal fascial defects, symptomatic stage II to IV anterior vaginal wall prolapse, and uterine prolapse equal or more than stage 2. VPVR was performed using the Capio device. In addition, anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, and vaginal hysterectomy were performed.

Results: The mean time required to perform the VPVR was 12.9 min (range, 11-18 min). The median blood loss during the VPVR was 35 ml (range, 20-65 ml). There were no major intraoperative complications. At 2-year follow-up, the rate of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse (stage ≥ 2) was 8.6%.

Conclusions: VPVR performed using the Capio device is associated with minimal dissection of the tissues, blood loss, and operating time and has low recurrence rate at 2-year follow-up.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / instrumentation*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse / surgery*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome