Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep;6(3):3-17. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.3.

A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethics.

Author information

  • 1Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Abstract

The goal of democratic deliberation (DD) bioethics research is to elicit informed and considered opinions on ethically controversial issues. But the trustworthiness of DD outcomes depends on the quality of deliberations. We provide a framework to evaluate the quality of deliberations and apply that framework to a DD project on surrogate consent for dementia research involving randomly selected samples of the older general public. Using a mixed method approach, we found that participants were very satisfied with the sessions, learned and used new information, were respectful and collaborative, and were able to "reason together" to arrive at societal policy recommendations. Implications and limitations of the paper are also discussed.

PMID:
21931233
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3336203
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk