Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):56.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

    Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.

    Source

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Barzilai Medical Center Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Ashkelon, Israel.

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    We sought to determine the effect of nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section on the formation of adhesions.

    STUDY DESIGN:

    This was a prospective randomized trial of 533 women undergoing primary cesarean section; in 256 the peritoneum was left open and in 277 it was closed. Fifty women in the nonclosure group and 47 women in the closure group were subsequently evaluated intraoperatively at a repeat cesarean. The presence of adhesions and their severity were evaluated at several sites.

    RESULTS:

    The nonclosure and closure groups were comparable with regard to the proportion of patients with adhesions at any site (60% vs 51%, respectively; P = .31). Time from incision to delivery was comparable in the nonclosure and closure groups (8.98 ± 4.7 vs 9.32 ± 5.2 minutes, respectively; P = .84).

    CONCLUSION:

    Closure or nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean section did not lead to large differences in the adhesion rate.

    Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

    PMID:
    21924397
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk