Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Br J Cancer. 2011 Sep 27;105(7):1039-41. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.356. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

Geographic remoteness and risk of advanced colorectal cancer at diagnosis in Queensland: a multilevel study.

Author information

  • 1Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Council Queensland, Spring Hill, Brisbane, QLD 4004, Australia. peterbaade@cancerqld.org.au

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

We examine the relationships between geographic remoteness, area disadvantage and risk of advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS:

Multilevel models were used to assess the area- and individual-level contributions to the risk of advanced disease among people aged 20-79 years diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Queensland, Australia between 1997 and 2007 (n=18,561).

RESULTS:

Multilevel analysis showed that colorectal cancer patients living in inner regional (OR=1.09, 1.01-1.19) and outer regional (OR=1.11, 1.01-1.22) areas were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancer than those in major cities (P=0.045) after adjusting for individual-level variables. The best-fitting final model did not include area disadvantage. Stratified analysis suggested this remoteness effect was limited to people diagnosed with colon cancer (P=0.048) and not significant for rectal cancer patients (P=0.873).

CONCLUSION:

Given the relationship between stage and survival outcomes, it is imperative that the reasons for these rurality inequities in advanced disease be identified and addressed.

PMID:
21897391
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3185960
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk