Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):415-23.

    Utilizing risk scores in determining the optimal revascularization strategy for complex coronary artery disease.

    Source

    Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Thoraxcenter, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

    Abstract

    Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of multivessel and/or left main stem disease have been shown to be potentially legitimate revascularization alternatives in appropriately selected patients. Risk stratification is an important component in guiding patients to identify the most appropriate revascularization modality (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) in conjunction with the Heart Team. The aim of this paper is to give the clinician a concise overview of the important established and evolving contemporary risk models in aiding this decision-making process. Risk models, based on clinical and anatomical variables alone, the novel concept of functional anatomical risk scores, and risk models combining aspects from both clinical and anatomical scores, are all discussed. The emerging concepts of the patient-empowered risk/benefit tradeoff between PCI and CABG to help personalize the choice of revascularization modality are also explored.

    PMID:
    21822610
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC3163791
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (1) Free text

    Fig. 1

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk