In vitro and in vivo evidence for the generation of strong growth-stimulating signals in dying cells.
(a) Stimulation of 4T1Fluc cellular growth in vitro by irradiated 4T1 cells. Top panel: growth of 4T1Fluc cells as observed by luciferase activities. The difference between each of the higher dose irradiated groups (8, 10, and 12 Gys) and controls (0 Gy and no feeder) is statistically significant (P<0.001, t-test). Error bars: SEM, n=4. Middle panel: representative images from bioluminescence imaging. Lower panel: selected photographs of cellular growth after crystal violet staining.
(b) Stimulation of Fluc-labeled cellular growth in vitro by irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells. Top panel, relative growth of MEF-supported tumor cells vs tumor cells seeded alone. Error bars: SEM, n=3. Lower panel, representative bioluminescence images. In all three cases, the difference in cellular growth between those with and those without MEF feeders are statistically significant (P<0.001, t test).
(c) Effect of tumor cell death on 4T1Fluc tumor cellular growth in vivo. Top panel: growth of 4T1Fluc cells as followed by luminescence signals. The difference between the two groups were highly significant (P<0.001 from day 4, one way ANOVA test). Error bars: SEM, n=5. Lower panel, representative images of mice at early and late stages of tumor growth.
(d) Effect of dying MEF cells on 4T1Fluc tumor cellular growth in vivo. Top panel, growth of 4T1Fluc cells. The difference between the two groups were again highly significant (P<0.001 from day 1, one way ANOVA test). Error bars: SEM, n=5. Lower panel, representative images of mice at early and late stages of tumor growth.