Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Sep;96(5):956-65. doi: 10.1037/a0024223.

Using Lancaster's mid-P correction to the Fisher's exact test for adverse impact analyses.

Author information

  • 1Biddle Consulting Group, Folsom, CA 95630, USA. dan@biddle.com

Abstract

Adverse impact is often assessed by evaluating whether the success rates for 2 groups on a selection procedure are significantly different. Although various statistical methods have been used to analyze adverse impact data, Fisher's exact test (FET) has been widely adopted, especially when sample sizes are small. In recent years, however, the statistical field has expressed concern regarding the default use of the FET and has proposed several alternative tests. This article reviews Lancaster's mid-P (LMP) test (Lancaster, 1961), an adjustment to the FET that tends to have increased power while maintaining a Type I error rate close to the nominal level. On the basis of Monte Carlo simulation results, the LMP test was found to outperform the FET across a wide range of conditions typical of adverse impact analyses. The LMP test was also found to provide better control over Type I errors than the large-sample Z-test when sample size was very small, but it tended to have slightly lower power than the Z-test under some conditions.

PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved

PMID:
21688881
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk