Novel phenotypes associated with loss of H2B–H3 cross-talk. (A) PCR was used to determine VI-R telomere length in WT (FGY8.2), htbK123R (FGY8.3), Δrad6 (FGY8.4), Δbre1 (FGY8.5), Δset1 (FGY8.6), Δset1 Δdot1 (FGY8.7), Δdot1 (FGY8.8), hht2K4R (FGY8.17), htbK123R Δsir4 (FGY8.11), and Δsir4 (FGY8.10) cells. Note that the congenic WT strain for hht2K4R (FGY8.18) is different from FGY8.2, which is congenic with all other strains. Representative image of three independent experiments. (B) Fluorescence microscopy analysis, comparing localization of telomere-proximal GFP-LacI (green) vs. Nsp1 (red). Left, representative image of cells, showing those that were scored as GFP-LacI being at the nuclear periphery or the nucleoplasm. Right, quantification of GFP-LacI signals localized to the nuclear periphery for each of the three telomeres in three yeast backgrounds WT (ICY119, ICY123, ICY127), htbK123R (ICY120, ICY124, ICY128), and Δset1 (ICY131, ICY132, ICY133). Error bars indicate standard errors from at least two independent experiments. (C) Fluorescence microscopy analysis, comparing localization of LacO sites integrated proximal to the GAL1 locus in WT (ICY74) or Δrad6 (ICY31) cells. Left, representative image of cells, showing those that were scored as GFP-LacI being at the nuclear periphery or the nucleoplasm. Right, quantification of GFP-LacI signals localized to the nuclear periphery in media with either glucose (off) or galactose (on) as the carbon source. Error bars indicate standard errors from at least two biological replicates. (D) ChIP analysis, examining association of NUPs with sequences proximal to the VI-R telomere. ChIP DNA was sampled with two sets of primers: 4040 and 160 base pairs from the TG repeats of VI-R. Error bars indicate standard errors from four independent experiments. (E) Dilutions (1:9) of yeast strains WT (FGY8.2), htbK123R (FGY8.3), Δbre1 (FGY8.5), Δset1 (FGY8.6), and Δdot1 (FGY8.8) were spotted on YPAD plates and grown for 3 d at either 30 or 37°C.