Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.121. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

Comparison of 11C-choline with 18F-FDG in positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for staging urothelial carcinoma: a prospective study.

Author information

  • 1Institute of Urology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. shaygo1@yahoo.com

Abstract

PURPOSE:

11C-choline was postulated to provide better diagnostic capabilities than other tracers used in positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for staging urothelial carcinoma. We compared the value of using 11C-choline with the well investigated 18F-FDG tracer in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The study group included 20 consecutive patients with bladder cancer who underwent evaluation for local and metastatic disease using 11C-choline and 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. Patients were treated with radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy independent of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography results. The histopathological findings (when available), followup positron emission tomography and radiological imaging served as the reference standard. Using the paired t test we compared the maximum standardized uptake and lesion-to-background ratio of the tracers. The positive predictive values were determined.

RESULTS:

A total of 51 lesions showed abnormal tracer activity. The positive predictive value for all detected lesions was 84.7% for 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and 90.7% for 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. The corresponding positive predictive values for extravesical lesions were 79.4% and 88.2%, respectively. Discrepant findings between the tracers were noted at 11 sites. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography correctly identified 4 extravesical metastases missed by choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in the absence of a contrary observation. Mean maximum standardized uptake and lesion-to-background ratio at extravesical sites were significantly higher for FDG.

CONCLUSIONS:

Within the limitations of a relatively small number of patients and partial histopathological analysis, 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography appears to have no advantage compared to 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in the detection of metastatic bladder cancer. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography has a tendency toward greater accuracy.

Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
21679983
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk