Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Nov;34(4):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

Targeting the worst-off for free health care: a process evaluation in Burkina Faso.

Author information

  • 1Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada. valery.ridde@umontreal.ca

Abstract

Effective mechanisms to exempt the indigent from user fees at health care facilities are rare in Africa. A State-led intervention (2004-2005) and two action research projects (2007-2010) were implemented in a health district in Burkina Faso to exempt the indigent from user fees. This article presents the results of the process evaluation of these three interventions. Individual and group interviews were organized with the key stakeholders (health staff, community members) to document the strengths and weaknesses of key components of the interventions (relevance and uptake of the intervention, worst-off selection and information, financial arrangements). Data was subjected to content analysis and thematic analysis. The results show that all three intervention processes can be improved. Community-based targeting was better accepted by the stakeholders than was the State-led intervention. The strengths of the community-based approach were in clearly defining the selection criteria, informing the waiver beneficiaries, using a participative process and using endogenous funding. A weakness was that using endogenous funding led to restrictive selection by the community. The community-based approach appears to be the most effective, but it needs to be improved and retested to generate more knowledge before scaling up.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PMID:
21665051
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk