J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):350-1; author reply 351. Epub 2011 May 20.

Re: comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. S. M. Prasad, X. Gu, R. Lavelle, S. R. Lipsitz and J. C. Hu J Urol 2011; 185: 111-115.

Supplemental Content

Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. [J Urol. 2011]
Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Prasad SM, Gu X, Lavelle R, Lipsitz SR, Hu JC. J Urol. 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. [J Urol. 2011]
Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Cimen HI, Altinova S, Balbay MD. J Urol. 2011 Jul; 186(1):351; author reply 351-2.
Re: comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. [Eur Urol. 2012]
Re: comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Sohn M. Eur Urol. 2012 Jan; 61(1):221-3.
Review Technique of modern radical perineal prostatectomy. [Urology. 2002]
Review Technique of modern radical perineal prostatectomy.
Weldon VE. Urology. 2002 Oct; 60(4):689-94.
Review Relative advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. [Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002]
Review Relative advantages and disadvantages of radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Gillitzer R, Thüroff JW. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002 Aug; 43(2):167-90.

Re: comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasi...
Re: comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. S. M. Prasad, X. Gu, R. Lavelle, S. R. Lipsitz and J. C. Hu J Urol 2011; 185: 111-115.
J Urol. 2011 Jul ;186(1):350-1; author reply 351. Epub 2011 May 20 .

PubMed
Differential expression of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor subunits.
Differential expression of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor subunits.
Mol Pharmacol. 1990 May ;37(5):652-7.

PubMed
The role of surgical treatment in second primary lung cancer.
The role of surgical treatment in second primary lung cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Jul ;92(1):256-62. Epub 2011 May 19 .

PubMed
Clinicopathological significance of synchronous carcinoma in colorectal cancer.
Clinicopathological significance of synchronous carcinoma in colorectal cancer.
Am J Surg. 2011 Jul ;202(1):39-44. Epub 2011 May 19 .

PubMed
Should patients with cytologic high-grade intraepithelial lesions of the cervix ...
Should patients with cytologic high-grade intraepithelial lesions of the cervix be treated without colposcopic-guided biopsy?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep ;205(3):e8-9; author reply e9. Epub 2011 Mar 26 .

PubMed

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.