Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Biostat. 2011 Mar 4;7(1):16. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1297.

A complete graphical criterion for the adjustment formula in mediation analysis.

Author information

  • 1Harvard University, USA.

Abstract

Various assumptions have been used in the literature to identify natural direct and indirect effects in mediation analysis. These effects are of interest because they allow for effect decomposition of a total effect into a direct and indirect effect even in the presence of interactions or non-linear models. In this paper, we consider the relation and interpretation of various identification assumptions in terms of causal diagrams interpreted as a set of non-parametric structural equations. We show that for such causal diagrams, two sets of assumptions for identification that have been described in the literature are in fact equivalent in the sense that if either set of assumptions holds for all models inducing a particular causal diagram, then the other set of assumptions will also hold for all models inducing that diagram. We moreover build on prior work concerning a complete graphical identification criterion for covariate adjustment for total effects to provide a complete graphical criterion for using covariate adjustment to identify natural direct and indirect effects. Finally, we show that this criterion is equivalent to the two sets of independence assumptions used previously for mediation analysis.

KEYWORDS:

adjustment; causal diagrams; confounding; covariate adjustment; mediation; natural direct and indirect effects

PMID:
21556286
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3083137
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (4)Free text

Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for iFactory Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk