Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):465-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.5.465.

Coercion in psychiatric care: systematic review of correlates and themes.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Hawkes Bay DistrictHealth Board, New Zealand. giles.newtonhowes@hbdhb.govt.nz

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study systematically examined the empirical literature on the themes and correlates of coercion as defined by the subjective experience of patients in psychiatric care.

METHODS:

The study was a systematic review of the literature on coercion as covered in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. From qualitative studies, themes that the authors identified were extracted. From quantitative studies, correlational and outcome data were extracted.

RESULTS:

The final analysis included 27 articles. Themes related to perceived coercion were almost all negative. Correlation and outcome data were insufficiently homogeneous to allow meaningful combined statistical analysis. There was no strong quantitative evidence that the experience of coercion is negatively or positively associated with psychopathology or general well-being.

CONCLUSIONS:

Coercion was commonly felt by patients as dehumanizing. Compulsory actions likely to increase perceived coercion had mixed correlates, and it was therefore difficult to predict who is at greatest risk of experiencing coercion as a "side effect" of intervention. Clinicians should routinely consider that all patients have the potential to experience an intervention as coercive.

Comment in

PMID:
21532070
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk