Source
Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to develop and to assess the validity and reliability of two brief questionnaires for assessing patient experiences with hospital and outpatient care in a low-income setting.
DESIGN:
Using literature review and data from focus groups (n = 14), we developed questionnaires to assess patient experiences with inpatient (I-PAHC) and with outpatient (O-PAHC) care in a low-income setting. Questionnaires were administered in person by trained interviewers. Construct validity was assessed with factor analysis; convergent validity was assessed by correlating summary scores for each scale with overall patient evaluations, and reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha coefficients.
SETTING:
Eight health facilities in Ethiopia.
PARTICIPANTS:
Patients >18 years old who had a hospital stay >1 day (n = 230), and patients who received outpatient care (n = 486).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Patient evaluations of health care experiences.
RESULTS:
The factor analysis revealed 12 items that loaded on five factors for the I-PAHC questionnaire. The O-PAHC showed similar results with 13 items that loaded on four factors. Summary scores for nearly all factors were significantly associated (P-value < 0.05) with the patient's overall evaluation score. The measure of reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficients, showed good to excellent internal consistency for all scales.
CONCLUSIONS:
The I-PAHC on O-PAHC questionnaires can be useful in assessing patients' evaluations of care delivery in low-income settings. The questionnaires are brief and can be integrated into health systems strengthening efforts with the support of leadership at the health facility and the country levels.