Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Apr;16(4):047003. doi: 10.1117/1.3564910.

Comparison of human optimized bacterial luciferase, firefly luciferase, and green fluorescent protein for continuous imaging of cell culture and animal models.

Author information

  • 1University of Tennessee, Center for Environmental Biotechnology, 1414 Circle Drive, 676 Dabney Hall, Knoxville, Tennesssee 37996, USA.

Abstract

Bioluminescent and fluorescent reporter systems have enabled the rapid and continued growth of the optical imaging field over the last two decades. Of particular interest has been noninvasive signal detection from mammalian tissues under both cell culture and whole animal settings. Here we report on the advantages and limitations of imaging using a recently introduced bacterial luciferase (lux) reporter system engineered for increased bioluminescent expression in the mammalian cellular environment. Comparison with the bioluminescent firefly luciferase (Luc) system and green fluorescent protein system under cell culture conditions demonstrated a reduced average radiance, but maintained a more constant level of bioluminescent output without the need for substrate addition or exogenous excitation to elicit the production of signal. Comparison with the Luc system following subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injection into nude mice hosts demonstrated the ability to obtain similar detection patterns with in vitro experiments at cell population sizes above 2.5 × 10(4) cells but at the cost of increasing overall image integration time.

PMID:
21529093
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3094131
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk