Detection of KLF15 interaction with HBV core and surface promoters in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays. (A) Western blot analysis of recombinant KLF15 (KLF15) protein expressed in 293T cells and purified using an anti-FLAG affinity column. Western blot analyses were conducted using antibodies directed against KLF15, the FLAG tag, Sp1 and NF-Y. Lane 1, crude cell lysates; lane 2, unbound fraction of the affinity column; and lane 3, eluate of the bound fraction. (B) EMSA showed the specific binding of core promoter (CP35) by KLF15. Lanes 1–7, CP35 probe incubated with KLF15; lanes 2–4, competition with 100-fold excess of unlabeled competitor (CPT) CP35 (CP), CLCK1 (CK) and non-specific (NS) MLTF oligonucleotides, respectively; lane 5, supershift with 1 μg anti-KLF15 antibody; lane 6, supershift with 2 μg anti-KLF15 antibody; lane 7, supershift with 2 μg control antibody; lane 8, CP35 probe and 2 μg anti-KLF15 antibody only. The specific KLF15-DNA complex (arrow) and supershift (arrowhead) are indicated. (C) Binding of CP35 and KLF15 (lane 1) in the presence of an increasing amount (5-, 10-, 20-fold) of unlabeled CP35 (lanes 2–4) and CP35-2m (lanes 5–7). CP35-2m contained mutations in KLF15 binding sites. (D) EMSA using surface promoter (SP70) and KLF15. Lane 1, SP70 probe only; lane 2, SP70 probe plus KLF15; lanes 3–4, same as in lane 2 with the addition of 100-fold excess of unlabeled SP70 (lane 3) or 100-fold excess of non-specific MLTF oligonucleotide (lane 4). (E) Lane 1, SP70 probe only; lane 2, SP70 probe plus KLF15; lanes 3 and 4, supershift with 1 μg and 2 μg anti-KLF15 antibody. (F) Top panel: ChIP assays showed that KLF15 bound to the wild-type core promoter (CP-wt), but not to the mutant core promoter where the two potential KLF15 binding sites were mutated (Top panel). The mouse IgG was used as the control in the ChIP assay. Middle panel: ChIP assays showed that KLF15 binding to the surface promoter (SP-wt) was reduced by about 40% if Sp1 binding sites were mutated (Z1/Z2-mut). In contrast, Sp1 binding to the surface promoter was abolished by the Z1/Z2 mutations. Bottom panel: Although the M2 mutation suppressed NF-Y binding to the surface promoter, it had little effect on KLF15 binding.