A comparison of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Anaesthesia. 2011 Jun;66(6):503-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06713.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

Abstract

The potential advantages of pressure-controlled over volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic surgery have yet to be proven. We randomly assigned 42 patients with BMI <30 kg.m(-2) scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to receive either pressure- or volume-controlled ventilation. Compared with volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation resulted in a significant decrease in mean (SD) peak airway pressure at 10 min (20.4 (2.7) vs 24.0 (4.7)cmH₂O, p=0.004) and 30 min (20.7 (3.0) vs 23.9 (4.9)cmH₂O, p=0.015) and an increase in mean airway pressure at 10 min (10.5 (0.9) vs 9.6 (1.1)cmH₂O, p=0.007) and 30 min (10.5 (1.1) vs 9.6 (1.2)cmH₂O, p=0.016) after the start of surgery. Gas exchange and haemodynamic stability were similar. We conclude that pressure-controlled ventilation is a safe alternative and offers some advantages to volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in non-obese patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Airway Resistance / physiology
  • Algorithms
  • Anesthesia, General / methods
  • Carbon Dioxide / blood
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
  • Female
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Oxygen / blood
  • Partial Pressure
  • Positive-Pressure Respiration / methods
  • Respiration, Artificial / methods*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Carbon Dioxide
  • Oxygen