Subcellular distribution and stability of HIV-1 IN are not affected by mutation of SUMOylation consensus motifs. A, HeLa cells expressing WT or 3KR or 3EQ IN-FLAG were fixed with 4% PFA and then stained with an antibody anti-FLAG, followed by an Alexa488-conjugated secondary antibody. Cells were visualized on a confocal microscope, using a ×63 magnification. Representative images are shown. B, 24 h after transfection, 293T cells expressing FLAG-tagged INWT, IN3R, or IN3Q were subject to cell fractionation followed by Western blot with anti-IN. Purity of the fractions was verified with a nuclear marker, H2B, and a cytoplasmic marker, LDH. Following quantification of ECL signals with ImageJ, the distribution of WT or mutant IN proteins in the nucleus and the cytoplasm was determined by dividing the intensity of IN signals for the corresponding H2B or LDH signals. The values for INWT were arbitrarily set to 100. C, 24 h after transfection, 293T cells expressing FLAG-tagged INWT, IN3KR, or IN3EQ were treated with cycloheximide (CHX) or MG132 or left untreated (NT). At the indicated times, cells were lysed, and total proteins (25 μg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot with anti-IN or anti-actin antibodies. D, ECL signals from Western blots of B were quantified using ImageJ, and values were plotted as the percentage of the signal at t = 0 (given an arbitrary value of 100%) remaining at the indicated time points. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments. WB, Western blot.