Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Acad Med. 2011 Apr;86(4):412-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820cdb28.

Commentary: pitfalls in assessment of competency-based educational objectives.

Author information

  • 1Office of Curriculum and Assessment, and associate professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA. Stephen_Lurie@urmc.rochester.edu

Abstract

Requirements for accreditation of medical professionals are increasingly cast in the language of general competencies. Because the language of these competencies is generally shaped by negotiations among stakeholders, however, it has proven difficult to attain consensus on precise definitions. This lack of clarity is amplified when attempting to measure these essentially political constructs in individual learners. The authors of this commentary frame these difficulties within modern views of test validity. The most significant obstacle to valid measurement is not necessarily a lack of useful tools but, rather, a general unwillingness to question whether the competencies themselves represent valid measurement constructs. Although competencies may prove useful in defining an overall social mission for organizations, such competencies should not be mistaken for measurable and distinct attributes that people can demonstrate in the context of their actual work.

© by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Comment on

PMID:
21451271
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk