Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun;22(6):645-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1395-2. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system.

Author information

  • 1Prime Care of SE OH, Genesis Health System, 1210, Ashland Avenue, Zanesville, OH 43701, USA. cha2ny@pol.net

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS:

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-examiner agreement of a previously described simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification (S-POP) system in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded fashion. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system's use in daily practice is hampered due to perceived complexity and difficulty of use. The S-POP was introduced in order to make the POPQ user-friendly and increase its usage (Swift et al. in Int Urogynecol J 17(6):615-620, 2006).

METHODS:

Five hundred eleven subjects underwent two separate pelvic exams in random order by two blinded examiners employing the S-POP at 12 centers around the world. Data were compared using weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS:

The weighted kappa statistics for the inter-examiner reliability of the S-POP were 0.87 for the overall stage, 0.89 and 0.81 for the anterior and posterior vaginal walls, 0.82 for the apex/cuff 0.89, and 0.84 for the cervix and vaginal fornix, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

There is an almost perfect inter-examiner agreement of the S-POP system for the overall stage and each point within the system.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk