Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):369-72; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012.

Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data.

Author information

  • 1University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Jeffrey.marks@uhhospitals.org

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

This study presents preliminary data from a prospective randomized multicenter, single-blinded trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC).

METHODS:

Patients with symptomatic gallstones, polyps, or biliary dyskinesia (ejection fraction <30%) were randomized to SILC or 4PLC. Data included operative time, estimated blood loss, length of skin and fascial incisions, complications, pain, satisfaction and cosmetic scoring, and conversion.

RESULTS:

Operating room time was longer with SILC (n = 50) versus 4PLC (n = 33). No differences were seen in blood loss, complications, or pain scores. Body image scores and cosmetic scores at 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks were significantly higher for SILC. Satisfaction scores, however, were similar.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preliminary results from this prospective trial showed SILC to be safe compared with 4PLC although operative times were longer. Cosmetic scores were higher for SILS compared with 4PLC. Satisfaction scores were similar although both groups reported a significantly higher preference towards SILC.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
21367381
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk