Display Settings:


Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Mar;29(1):71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Dec 18.

Outcomes research using quality improvement databases: evolving opportunities and challenges.

Author information

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1 H427 University Hospital Box 0048, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0048, USA. rsatyak@med.umich.edu


The challenges to prospective randomized controlled trials have necessitated the exploration of observational data sets that support research into the predictors and modulators of preoperative adverse events. The primary purpose and design of quality improvement databases is quality assessment and improvement at the local, regional, or national level. However, these data can also provide the opportunity to robustly study specific questions related to patient outcomes with no additional clinical risk to the patient. The virtual explosion of anesthesia-related registries has opened seemingly limitless opportunities for outcomes research in addition to generating hypothesis for more rigorous prospective analysis.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk