Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Jan;34(1):2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.11.008.

Evaluating the relationship among cavitation, zygapophyseal joint gapping, and spinal manipulation: an exploratory case series.

Author information

  • 1National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, IL 60510, USA. gcramer@nuhs.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This project determined the feasibility of conducting larger studies assessing the relationship between cavitation and zygapophyseal (Z) joint gapping following spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).

METHODS:

Five healthy volunteers (average age, 25.4 years) were screened and examined against inclusion and exclusion criteria. High-signal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers were fixed to T12, L3, and S1 spinous processes. Scout images were taken to verify the location of the markers. Axial images of the L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels were obtained in the neutral supine position. Following the first MRI, accelerometers were placed over the same spinous processes; and recordings were made from them during side-posture positioning and SMT. The accelerometers were removed, and each subject was scanned in side-posture. The greatest central anterior to posterior Z joint spaces (gap) were measured from the first and second MRI scans. Values obtained from the first scan were subtracted from those of the second, with a positive result indicating an increase in gapping following SMT (positive gapping difference). Gapping difference was compared between the up-side (SMT) joints vs the down-side (non-SMT) joints and between up-side cavitation vs up-side noncavitation joints.

RESULTS:

Greater gapping was found in Z joints that received SMT (0.5 ± 0.6 mm) vs non-SMT joints (-0.2 ± 0.6 mm), and vertebral segments that cavitated gapped more than those that did not cavitate (0.8 ± 0.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS:

A future clinical study is quite feasible. Forty subjects (30 in an SMT group and 10 in a control group) would be needed for appropriate power (0.90).

Copyright © 2011 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
21237402
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3582390
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk