Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 29;5(12):e15885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015885.

The blind nasotracheal aspiration method is not a useful tool for pathogen detection of pneumonia in children.

Author information

  • 1Epidemiology Department, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) is a major cause of hospitalization for children in China, while the etiological diagnosis of ALRI remains a challenge. This study was performed to evaluate the utility of the blind Nasotracheal aspiration (NTA) in the pathogen detection in ALRI through an evaluation of the test's specificity.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:

A hospital-based study of children ≤3 years was carried out from March 2006 through March 2007 in Suzhou University Affiliated Children's Hospital, including 379 cases with ALRI from the respiratory wards, and 394 controls receiving elective surgery. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and NTA specimens were taken on admission. S. pneumoniae was isolated from 10.3% of NTA samples from ALRI children, H. influenzae from 15.3%, and M. catarrhalis from 4.7%. The false positive rate--the strains from NTA in control group children--was 8.4% (95% CI: 5.8%-11.4%) for S. pneumoniae, 27.2% (95% CI: 22.7-31.5%) for H. influenzae, and 22.1% (95% CI: 18.0%-26.2%) for M. catarrhalis. The agreement between NPS and NTA in the control group was over 70%.

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE:

The blind NTA test is not a useful test for etiologic diagnosis of ALRI.

PMID:
21209964
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3012105
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk