Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Blood. 2011 Mar 3;117(9):2618-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-287102. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

In vitro assays misrepresent in vivo lineage potentials of murine lymphoid progenitors.

Author information

  • 1Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. lehrlich@mail.utexas.edu

Abstract

The identity of T-cell progenitors that seed the thymus has remained controversial, largely because many studies differ over whether these progenitors retain myeloid potential. Contradictory reports diverge in their use of various in vitro and in vivo assays. To consolidate these discordant findings, we compared the myeloid potential of 2 putative thymus seeding populations, common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) and multipotent progenitors (MPPs), and the earliest intrathymic progenitor (DN1), using 2 in vitro assays and in vivo readouts. These assays gave contradictory results: CLP and DN1 displayed surprisingly robust myeloid potential on OP9-DL1 in vitro stromal cocultures but displayed little myeloid potential in vivo, as well as in methylcellulose cultures. MPP, on the other hand, displayed robust myeloid potential in all settings. We conclude that stromal cocultures reveal cryptic, but nonphysiologic, myeloid potentials of lymphoid progenitors, providing an explanation for contradictory findings in the field and underscoring the importance of using in vivo assays for the determination of physiologic lineage potentials.

© 2011 by The American Society of Hematology

Comment in

PMID:
21163922
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3062354
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (4)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk