Abstract

The first step in a genetic analysis of aging is to identify and characterize the genetic mutants and their controls that will be used. Such mutants or strains are initially identified by their effect on the life span. Yet many genetic interventions are known to have some effect on the life span without necessarily affecting the aging process. It is therefore necessary to prove that one is actually dealing with an aging mutant before one draws strong inferences from the data. Casarett's rules provide an operational test for doing so, relying as they do on the comparison of aging bio-markers in the experimental and reference strains. We show that our previously described genetically based long-lived NDC-L strain and its normal-lived NDC-R control strain differ only in the chronological age of expression of two behavioral and three physiological functional age biomarkers. They do not differ in the sequence or the physiological age of expression of these biomarkers. These two strains comply with the Casarett rules and thereby comprise a valid tool with which to conduct a comparative genetic analysis of aging. The implications of the available data are discussed, including the possibility that aging in these strains of Drosophila melanogaster may be the result of a multiphasic developmental process.