Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Periodontol. 2011 May;82(5):708-15. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100450. Epub 2010 Dec 7.

Equicrestal and subcrestal dental implants: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of nine retrieved human implants.

Author information

  • 1Dental School, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Stability of peri-implant crestal bone plays a relevant role relative to the presence or absence of interdental papilla. Several factors can contribute to the crestal bone resorption observed around two-piece implants, such as the presence of a microgap at the level of the implant-abutment junction, the type of connection between implant and prosthetic components, the implant positioning relative to the alveolar crest, and the interimplant distance. Subcrestal positioning of dental implants has been proposed to decrease the risk of exposure of the metal of the top of the implant or of the abutment margin, and to get enough space in a vertical dimension to create a harmoniously esthetic emergence profile.

METHODS:

The present retrospective histologic study was performed to evaluate dental implants retrieved from human jaws that had been inserted in an equicrestal or subcrestal position. A total of nine implants were evaluated: five of these had been inserted in an equicrestal position, whereas the other four had been positioned subcrestally (1 to 3 mm).

RESULTS:

In all subcrestally placed implants, preexisting and newly formed bone was found over the implant shoulder. In the equicrestal implants, crestal bone resorption (0.5 to 1.5 mm) was present around all implants.

CONCLUSION:

The subcrestal position of the implants resulted in bone located above the implant shoulder.

PMID:
21138355
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk