Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Dec;22(12):668-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00564.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

Breast cancer screening in women: An integrative literature review.

Author information

  • 1Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA. patricia_ravert@byu.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To (a) conduct a thorough search of the literature for breast cancer screening studies utilizing mammography, ultrasound, or breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (b) critically appraise these studies to aid the nurse practitioner in choosing the most appropriate screening tool for their individual patients.

DATA SOURCES:

Articles were identified from the following databases: CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, EBSCO, ISI, and Cochrane Library. Reference lists from all articles were reviewed and an authority in breast cancer screening was contacted regarding the reference list.

CONCLUSIONS:

Breast MRI had a higher sensitivity than mammography and ultrasound in all studies comparing breast MRI. The specificity was lower for breast MRI than for mammography in five out of six studies. The ultrasound had a higher sensitivity than mammography in all five studies examining women with dense breast tissue.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:

Women who fall into high-risk categories should be screened yearly with breast MRI and mammography. Women with dense breast tissue according to a standardized density score should be screened yearly with ultrasound and mammography. Women in the general population should be screened yearly with mammography.

©2010 The Author(s) Journal compilation ©2010 American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

PMID:
21129075
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk