Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Lipidol. 2010 May-Jun;4(3):152-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

Why is non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol a better marker of the risk of vascular disease than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol?

Author information

  • 1Mike Rosenbloom Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, McGill University Health Centre, Room H7.22, Royal Vic Hosp, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada. allansniderman@hotmail.com

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been the focus of managing lipoprotein disorders for decades. It is now time to consider a change. Both apolipoprotein B (apoB) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) have been shown to be more accurate markers of cardiovascular risk than LDL-C. ApoB measures total atherogenic particle number, of which 90% are LDL particles. Therefore, LDL particle number determines plasma apoB in most patients. Non-HDL-C is widely assumed to be superior to LDL-C when triglyceride concentrations are elevated (even modestly) because it includes the cholesterol in very-low-density lipoprotein. However, evidence does not support this concept. Rather, non-HDL-C appears to be an indirect way of estimating apoB. We argue that we should integrate the information from non-HDL-C and apoB for better risk assessment and a better target of therapy.

Copyright © 2010 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Comment in

PMID:
21122647
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk