Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Birth. 2010 Dec;37(4):341-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00431.x.

Home birth: gone away, gone astray, and here to stay.

Author information

  • Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.

Abstract

Home birth has attracted a great deal of attention of late, culminating in a meta-analysis to assess its risks for mother and baby. Mothers were estimated to be 2.6 times more likely to die and babies 3 times more likely to die from a planned home birth than from a planned hospital birth. The actual data on which these estimates were based demonstrate that meta-analysis can be developed into an art that suits whatever purpose its authors hope to achieve. Combining studies of home versus hospital, without differentiating what is inside them, where they are, and what is around them, is akin to producing a fruit salad with potatoes, pineapples, and celery.

© 2010, Copyright the Author. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comment on

PMID:
21083728
[PubMed]

Publication Types

Publication Types

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk