Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
J Surg Res. 2011 Jan;165(1):e37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.025. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

Multiple imputation in trauma disparity research.

Author information

  • 1Department of Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC 20060, USA. toyetunji@howard.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Missing data has remained a major disparity in trauma outcomes research due to missing race and insurance data. Multiple imputation (M.IMP) has been recommended as a solution to deal with this major drawback.

STUDY DESIGN:

Using the National Data Trauma Bank (NTDB) as an example, a complete dataset was developed by deleting cases with missing data across variables of interest. An incomplete dataset was then created from the complete set using random deletion to simulate the original NTDB, followed by five M.IMP rounds to generate a final imputed dataset. Identical multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effect of race and insurance on mortality in both datasets.

RESULTS:

Missing data proportions for known trauma mortality covariates were as follows: age-4%, gender-0.4%, race-8%, insurance-17%, injury severity score-6%, revised trauma score-20%, and trauma type-3%. The M.IMP dataset results were qualitatively similar to the original dataset.

CONCLUSION:

M.IMP is a feasible tool in NTDB for handling missing race and insurance data.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
21067775
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk