Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 May;65(5):399-406. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.111195. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

A labour of Sisyphus? Public policy and health inequalities research from the Black and Acheson Reports to the Marmot Review.

Author information

  • 1Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queens Campus, Stockton on Tees, UK. clare.bambra@durham.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To explore similarities and differences in policy content and the political context of the three main English government reports on health inequalities: the Black Report (1980), the Acheson Enquiry (1998), and the Marmot Review (2010).

METHODS:

Thematic policy and context analysis of the Black Report (1980), the Acheson Enquiry (1998), and the Marmot Review (2010) in terms of: (i) underpinning theoretical principles; (ii) policy recommendations; (iii) the political contexts in which each was released; and (iv) their actual or potential influence on research and policy.

RESULTS:

There were great similarities and very few differences in terms of both the theoretical principles guiding the recommendations of these reports and the focus of the recommendations themselves. However, there were clear differences in terms of the political contexts of each report, as well as their subsequent impacts on research and policy.

CONCLUSION:

The paper calls into question the progress of health inequalities research, the use of evidence and of the links between research, politics and policy.

PMID:
21051781
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk