Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Arch Surg. 2010 Oct;145(10):939-45. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.193.

Introduction to propensity scores: A case study on the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy.

Author information

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, 48109-5033, USA. mhemmila@umich.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To demonstrate the use of propensity scores to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Academic and private hospitals.

PATIENTS:

All patients undergoing open or laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 21 475) in the Public Use File of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were included in the study. We first evaluated the surgical approach (laparoscopic vs open) using multivariate logistic regression. We next generated propensity scores and compared outcomes for open and laparoscopic appendectomy in a 1:1 matched cohort. Covariates in the model for propensity scores included comorbidities, age, sex, race, and evidence of perforation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Patient morbidity and mortality, rate of return to operating room, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS:

Twenty-eight percent of patients underwent open appendectomy, and 72% had a laparoscopic approach; 33% (open) vs 14% (laparoscopic) had evidence of a ruptured appendix. In the propensity-matched cohort, there was no difference in mortality (0.3% vs 0.2%), reoperation (1.8% vs 1.5%), or incidence of major complications (5.9% vs 5.4%) between groups. Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy experienced fewer wound infections (odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.5) and fewer episodes of sepsis (0.8; 0.6-1.0) but had a greater risk of intra-abdominal abscess (1.7; 1.3-2.2). An analysis using multivariate adjustment resulted in similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS:

After accounting for patient severity, open and laparoscopic appendectomy had similar clinical outcomes. In this case study, propensity score methods and multivariate adjustment yielded nearly identical results.

Comment in

PMID:
20956761
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk