Protein subnetworks reveal known and putative MAPK scaffolds. Network neighborhoods are shown for (a) Filamin protein FLNA, (b) the Na-H exchanger NHE1, (c) RAN binding protein RANBP9, and (d) the kinesin family member KIF26A. Newly-identified Y2H interactions (red) and interactions from literature are shown (blue). Proteins are colored based on their annotation as membrane (grey), MAPK (blue), transcription factor (red), or phosphorylated under EGF stimulation (yellow border)8. (e) Binding of in vitro-translated MAP3K7 (TAK1) to GST tagged C-terminus of NHE1 or GST alone. N-moesin, a known NHE1 binding partner is used as a positive control31. Expressed input proteins used for in vitro binding assays are marked with asterisks. (f) Phosphorylated (pp38) and total levels of p38, assayed with and without PMA stimulation and two different siRNA knockdowns of NHE1. The bars quantify the pp38 / p38 ratio by image analysis of western blot. As a negative control, we observed nearly equal amounts of pp38 to p38 in the absence of PMA stimulation (−PMA). As a positive control, PMA stimulation with a scrambled siRNA induced p38 phosphorylation (Scramble, +PMA). (g) Using a luciferase reporter fused to the AP-1 gene, we tested the ability of various siRNAs to reduce AP-1 activation when stimulated with PMA32. As a negative control, scrambled siRNAs resulted in maximal AP-1 transcription (“Scramble”). As positive controls, siRNAs targeted to luciferase showed a large reduction of luminescence (“Luciferase”), and siRNAs directed directly to p38, upstream of AP-1, reduced signal intensity by 50%. Error bars represent s.e.m. with 6 replicates.