Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Ind Med. 2010 Oct;53(10):995-1001. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20851.

Improving the quality of industry and occupation data at a central cancer registry.

Author information

  • 1New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, USA. karmenti@dhhs.state.nh.us

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Central cancer registries are required to collect industry and occupation (I/O) information when available, but the data reported are often incomplete.

METHODS:

We audited the completeness of I/O data in the New Hampshire State Cancer Registry (NHSCR) database for diagnosis year 2005, and reviewed medical records for a convenience sample of 474 of these cases. We compared I/O data quality before and after a statewide registrar training session on occupationally related cancers.

RESULTS:

The original 2005 data contained both I/O data in 11.5% of cases, and lacked any I/O data in 74.5%. Corresponding figures for cases selected for audit were 15.2% and 77.2%, which improved to 54.2% and 11.8% after medical record review. After registrar training, 47% of reports contained both I/O data, and only 14.4% of cases lacked any I/O data.

CONCLUSIONS:

Statewide training to highlight the importance of I/O data is an effective method to improve I/O data quality.

© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk