Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Oct;42(8):728-35. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20962.

Factors influencing tumor response to photodynamic therapy sensitized by intratumor administration of methylene blue.

Author information

  • 1Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.

Erratum in

  • Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Feb;43(2):183.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:

We examined tumor response to methylene blue (MB)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) in a murine tumor model. The goal was to investigate the effects of drug-light interval (DLI), injection vehicle, and fluence on tumor destruction. Fluorescence and reflectance spectroscopy informed our understanding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

EMT6 tumor cells were implanted intradermally on the backs of female BALB/c mice and grown to ∼4-mm diameter. Mice were given a 35 µl, single site, intratumor injection of 500 µg/ml MB administered in either a water or a 5% ethanol-5% Cremophor-90% saline vehicle. PDT was begun either immediately or after a 1-hour DLI with a fluence rate of 60 mW/cm(2). Each animal received a fluence of 240 or 480 J/cm(2). Fluorescence and reflectance spectra were captured before and during irradiation.

RESULTS:

A protocol consisting of the Cremophor-based vehicle, 0 DLI, and a fluence of 480 J/cm(2) was the most effective, with a 55% cure rate as measured by no evidence of tumor 90 days after PDT. Use of the water vehicle with this fluence and DLI reduced the cure rate to 20%. Reducing the fluence to 240 J/cm(2) similarly reduced treatment efficacy with 0 and 1-hour DLIs. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified increased fluence, 0 versus 1-hour DLI, and the Cremophor versus water vehicle as highly significant independent predictors of long term tumor control (P < 0.01 in each case). Multivariate analysis with model selection revealed fluence and injection vehicle as the best predictors of survival hazards. Fluorescence spectroscopy in vivo showed that MB fluorescence decreased monotonically during a 2-hour dark interval but was restored by irradiation. Reflectance spectroscopy revealed that MB at this injected concentration attenuates the treatment beam significantly.

CONCLUSION:

Sensitizer delivery vehicle, drug-light interval, and fluence contribute significantly to the tumor response to MB-mediated PDT.

© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

PMID:
20848552
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2948599
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk